Wisdom Made Foolish

Καὶ ὅλως πότε τῶν Ἔλλήνων ἡ σοφία μεμώρανται, εἰ μὴ ὅτε ἠ ἀληθὴς τοῦ Θεοῦ σοφία ἐπὶ γῆς ἑαυτὴν ἐφανέρωσι; Πάλαι μὲν γὰρ πᾶσα ἡ οἰκουμένη καὶ πᾶς τόπος τῇ θρησκείᾳ τῶν εἰδώλων ἐπλανᾶτο, καὶ οὐδὲν ἄλλο ἢ τὰ εἴδωλα θεοὺς ἐνόμιζον οἱ ἄνθρωποι. Νῦν δὲ κατὰ πᾶσαν τὴν οἰκουμένην, τὴν μὲν τῶν εἰδώλων δεισιδαιμονίαν καταλιμπάνουσιν οἱ ἄνθρωποι, ἐπὶ δὲ τὸν Χριστὸν καταφεύγουσι, καὶ Θεὸν αὐτὸν προσκυνοῦντες, δι᾿ αὐτοῦ καὶ ὃν οὐκ ᾔδεισαν Πατέρα γινώσκουσι. Καὶ τό γε θαυμαστόν, διαφόρων ὄντων καὶ μυρίων σεβασμάτων, καὶ ἑκάστου τόπου τὸ ἴδιον ἔχοντος εἴδωλον, καὶ μὴ ἰσχύοντος τοῦ παρ᾿ αὐτοῖς λεγομένου θεοῦ τὸν πλησίον ὑπερβῆναι τόπον, ὥστε καὶ τοὺς ἐκ γειτόνων πεῖσαι σέβειν αὐτόν, ἀλλὰ μόλις καὶ ἐν τοῖς ἰδίοις θρησκευομένου οὐδεὶς γὰρ ἄλλος τὸν τοῦ γείτονος ἐσέβετο θεόν, ἀλλ᾿ ἕκαστος τὸ ἴδιον ἐφύλαττεν εἴδωλον, νομίζων τῶν πάντων αὐτὸ κύριον εἶναι, μόνος ὁ Χριστὸς παρὰ πᾶσιν εἷς καὶ πανταχοῦ ὁ αὐτὸς προσκυνεῖται· καὶ ὃ μὴ δεδύνηται τῶν εἰδώλων ἡ ἀσθένεια ποιῆσαι, ὥστε κἂν τοὺς πλησίον οἰκοῦντας πεῖσαι, τοῦτο ὁ Χριστὸς πεποίηκεν, οὐ μόνον τοὺς πλησίον ἀλλὰ καὶ πᾶσαν ἁπλῶς τὴν οἰκουμένην πείσας ἕνα καὶ τὸν αὐτὸν Κύριον σέβειν, καὶ δι᾿ αὐτοῦ Θεὸν τὸν αὐτοῦ Πατέρα. Καὶ πάλαι μὲν τὰ πανταχοῦ τῆς ἀπάτης τῶν μαντείων ἐπεπλήρωτο, καὶ τὰ ἐν Δελφοῖς καὶ Δωδώνῃ καὶ Βοιωτίᾳ καὶ Λυκίᾳ καὶ Λιβύῃ καὶ Αἰγύπτῳ καὶ Καβίροις μαντεύματα καὶ ἡ Πυθία ἐθαυμάζοντο τῇ φαντασίᾳ παρὰ τῶν ἀνθρώπων· νῦν δὲ ἀφ᾿ οὗ Χριστὸς καταγγέλλεται πανταχοῦ, πέπαυται καὶ τούτων ἡ μανία, καὶ οὐκ ἔστιν ἔτι λοιπὸν ἐν αὐτοῖς ὁ μαντευόμενος. Καὶ πάλαι μὲν δαίμονες ἐφαντασιοκόπουν τοὺς ἀνθρώπους, προκαταλαμβάνοντες πηγὰς ἢ ποταμοὺς ἢ ξύλα ἢ λίθους, καὶ οὕτως ταῖς μαγγανείαις ἐξέπληττον τοὺς ἄφρονας. Νῦν δὲ τῆς θείας ἐπιφανείας τοῦ Λόγου γεγενημένης πέπαυται τούτων ἡ φαντασία. Τῷ γὰρ σημείῳ τοῦ σταυροῦ καὶ μόνον ὁ ἄνθρωπος χρώμενος, ἀπελαύνει τούτων τὰς ἀπάτας. Καὶ πάλαι μὲν τοὺς παρὰ ποιηταῖς λεγομένους θεούς, Δία καὶ Κρόνον καὶ Ἀπόλλωνα καὶ ἥρωας, ἐνόμιζον οἱ ἄνθρωποι θεούς, καὶ τούτους ἐπλανῶντο σέβοντες· ἄρτι δὲ τοῦ Σωτῆρος ἐν ἀνθρώποις φανέντος, ἐκεῖνοι μὲν ἐγνώσθησαν ὄντες ἄνθρωποι θνητοί, μόνος δὲ ὁ Χριστὸς ἐν ἀνθρώποις ἐγνωρίσθη Θεὸς ἀληθινοῦ Θεοῦ Θεὸς Λόγος. Τί δὲ περὶ τῆς θαυμαζομένης παρ᾿ αὐτοῖς μαγείας ἄν τις εἴποι; Ὅτι πρὶν μὲν ἐπιδημῆσαι τὸν Λόγον, ἴσχυε καὶ ἐνήργει παρ᾿ Αἰγυπτίοις καὶ Χαλδαίοις καὶ Ἰνδοῖς αὕτη καὶ ἐξέπληττε τοὺς ὁρῶντας· τῇ δὲ παρουσίᾳ τῆς ἀληθείας καὶ τῇ ἐπιφανείᾳ τοῦ Λόγου διηλέγχθη καὶ αὕτη, καὶ κατηργήθη παντελῶς. Περὶ δὲ τῆς Ἑλληνικῆς σοφίας καὶ τῆς τῶν φιλοσόφων μεγαλοφωνίας, νομίζω μηδένα τοῦ παρ᾿ ἡμῶν δεῖσθαι λόγου, ἐπ᾿ ὄψει πάντων ὄντος τοῦ θαύματος, ὅτι τοσαῦτα γραψάντων τῶν παρ᾿ Ἕλλησι σοφῶν καὶ μὴ δυνηθέντων πεῖσαι κἂν ὀλίγους ἐκ τῶν πλησίον τόπων περὶ ἀθανασίας καὶ τοῦ κατ᾿ ἀρετὴν βίου, μόνος ὁ Χριστὸς δι᾿ εὐτελῶν ῥημάτων, καὶ δι᾿ ἀνθρώπων οὐ κατὰ τὴν γλῶτταν σοφῶν, κατὰ πᾶσαν τὴν οἰκουμένην παμπληθεῖς ἐκκλησίας ἔπεισεν ἀνθρώπων καταφρονεῖν μὲν θανάτου, φρονεῖν δὲ ἀθάνατα, καὶ τὰ μὲν πρόσκαιρα παρορᾶν, εἰς δὲ τὰ αἰώνια ἀποβλέπειν, καὶ μηδὲν μὲν ἡγεῖσθαι τὴν ἐπὶ γῆς δόξαν, μόνης δὲ τῆς ἀθανασίας ἀντιποιεῖσθαι Ἅγιος Αθανάσιος ο Μέγας, Λόγος περί της Ενανθρωπίσεως του Λόγου Source: Migne PG 25.177d-181a

And when was the wisdom of the Greeks made foolish, but when the true wisdom of God manifested itself on earth? For formerly the whole world and every place was deceived by idols worship, and men thought nothing else but that the idols were gods, but now over the whole world men are abandoning the superstition of idols and fleeing to Christ and worshipping Him as God, and through Him coming to know the Father who they did not know. And, as another wonder, whereas the objects of worship were once various and many, and each place had its own idol, and he who was reckoned a god among them was not able to pass over to a neighbouring place to persuade neighbouring peoples to worship him, but he was even barely revered among his own people, for no one else worshipped another's god, but rather each kept to his own idol, thinking it was the lord of all, now Christ alone is worshipped as one and the same among all the peoples, and what the weakness of the idols was unable to do, that is, to persuade even those dwelling nearby, Christ has accomplished, not only persuading those close at hand, but even the whole world, to revere one and the same Lord, and through Him God His Father. Again once every place was filled with the deceits of oracles, and those in Delphi and Boeotia and Lycia and Egypt and those of the Cabiri and the Pythoness, were held in awe in men's imagination, but now that Christ is preached everywhere, their madness has ceased and there is none among them to give prophecy. And once demons used to delude men, occupying wells or rivers, or trees or stones, and thus they imposed upon the simple minded with tricks, but now, after the Divine revelation, their deception has ceased, for by the sign of the Cross, if a man but use it, their deceits are driven off. And when once through the words of poets men thought Zeus and Cronos and Apollo were gods, and were deceived into revering them, now that the Saviour has appeared among men, those others have been understood to be but mortal men, and Christ alone has been understood among men to be the true God, the Word of God. And what is one to say of the magic thought wonderful among them? That before the Word dwelt among us it was strong and active among the Egyptians, and the Chaldeans, and Indians, and those who saw it were astonished, but then with the presence of the Truth and the appearance of the Word, it also has been refuted and utterly reduced. And as for the Gentile wisdom and the loud proclamations of philosophers, I think no word of ours is needed, since the wonder is before everyone's eyes, that despite so much being written by those who were wise among the Greeks, they were unable to persuade even a few from among their own neighbours about immortality and the virtuous life, but Christ alone, with common language, and through men who were not clever in their tongues, persuaded churches full of men throughout the whole world to despise death and to give thought to eternal things, even to look beyond what is temporal and to look to what is eternal, and to account earthly glory nothing and to strive for heavenly glory alone. Saint Athanasius the Great, On The Incarnation of The Word

The House On A Rock

Simulabo eum viro sapienti, qui aedificavit domum suam supra petram, et descendit pluvia, et venerunt flumina, et flaverunt venti... Sicut enim non est possibile, ut ex sola pluvi fructicet terra, nisi falverit super eam ventus: sic non est possibile, ut sola doctrina corrigat hominem, nisi cooperatrus fuerit Spiritus sanctus in corde ipsius. Flumen autem sunt, ex parte quidem mala, hominis immundo spiritu pleni, et in verbositate structi: quales sunt philosophi dogmatum diversorum, ortators, grammatici, caeterique non secundum Deum sapientes: de quorum ventre exeunt flumina aquae mortuae. Ex parte autem bona, evangelistae, doctores populi, caeterique sapientes secundum Deum: de quorum ventre exeunt flumina aquae vivae. Ecclesiam ergo, quam Christus vir sapiens super petram aedificavit, neque pluvia mendacis doctrinae corrumpit, neque diabolicus ventus impelit, neque violentorum fluminum impetus movet. Nam etsi humiliater Ecclesia propter tenationem, tamen perire non potest propter fidem Christi. Nec est contrarium, quod quidam de Ecclesia cadunt: illi enim numquam Christiani fuerunt. Sicut non omnes qui sunt ex Israel, hi sunt Israelitae: sic non omnes qui Christiani dicuntur, sunt et Christi. Christianorum enim opera sunt aspicienda, non nomina. Dicit enim Apostolus: Cognovit Dominus qui sunt ipsius; et discedat ab iniquitate omnis qui invocat nomen Domini Opus Imperfectum in Matthaeum, Homilia XX Source: Migne PG 56.678-9

'I shall liken him to a wise man who built his house on a rock and the rains fells and the floods came, and the winds blew...' 1 As it not possible that the earth is fructified by rain alone but a wind must blow upon it, so it is not possible that teaching alone will correct a man unless the Holy Spirit works in his heart. There are rivers which are bad, which are men full with unclean spirits and fashioned by verbosity, like the philosophers of the various schools, and orators and grammarians, and the rest who are not wise according to God, and from their stomachs pour out the river waters of death. And there are good rivers, the evangelists, teachers of the people, and others who are wise according to God, from which flow the waters of life. 2 The Church, therefore, which the wise man Christ built on a rock, 3 is not corrupted by the rains of false teaching, nor shaken by the devil's wind, not does the force of raging rivers move it. For even if the Church is humiliated in trials yet it cannot perish because of faith in Christ. On the contrary when some of the Church fall, they never were Christians, since as not all from Israel are Israelites, 4 so not all who are called Christians belong to Christ. The works of Christians must be seen not just the name. The Apostle says, 'God knows who are His, and He shall cut off from every wickedness the one who calls on the name of the Lord.' 5 Opus Imperfectum on Matthew, from Homily 20 1 Mt 7.24-25 2 Jn 7.38 3 Mt 16.18 4 Rom 9.6 5 2 Tim 2.19

The Eyes Of The Wise

VERANUS. Quare dicit: Sapientis oculi in capite eius, stultus autem in tenebris ambulat? Nunquid oculi stulti non sunt in capite ipsius? SALONIUS. Oculi in hoc loco non possunt corporales, sed spirituales intelligi: oculi videlicet mentis, id est sensus et intentiones animi. Per caput vero designatur Christus, unde Apostolus ait: Caput viri Christus. Oculi viri sapientis in capite sunt, quia vir sapiens omnem intentionem suam ad Christum dirigit, et in Christo collocat, et oculos suae mentis semper ad coelestia meditanda sublevat: stultus vero in tenebris ambulat, quia et stultitiae simul, et peccatorum suorum tenebris obscuratur, et amore huius mundi obscuratur; odit enim coelestia, et ideo non potest, sicut vir sapiens, ad coelum oculos suos erigere, quia non cogitat ea quae Dei sunt, sed quae huius saeculi. VERANUS. Quid ergo distat inter virum sapientem et stultum? SALONIUS. Hoc distat, quia iste sapientia et claritate illustratur et exornatur; ille vero errore stultitiae suae obtenebratur et deturbatur. Tantum quippe distat inter sapientem et stultum, quantum inter diem et noctem, lucem et tenebras. VERANUS. Quomodo tantum distat inter sapientem et stultum, cum unus sit interitus utriusque: sic enim moritur doctus ut indoctus, sapiens ut insipiens? SALONIUS. Quamvis unus sit occasus, et similis mors sapientis et stulti, et saepe in hac vita magis affligatur sapiens quam stultus; tamen non erit similis memoria in futuro nec aequalem percipient remunerationem, quoniam sapiens in die iudicii ad regni coelestis elevabitur gloriam, stultus vero demergetur in aeterna damnationis tormenta. VERANUS. Quis est ergo iste sapiens qui tantum distat a stulto quantum lux a tenebris? Nunquid ille qui philosophicae tantum disciplinae pollet affluentia, vel liberalium artium splendet eloquentia? SALONIUS. Nonnunquam saecularis prudentia inimica Deo est, et carnalis sapientia, quamvis eloquentiae floribus exornetur, nullum tamen in se spiritualem, nullum perpetuae beatitudinis fructum continet: sed ille veraciter est sapiens qui Dominum diligit, qui eius mandata custodit, et quantum possibile est humanae fragilitati, eius voluntatem in omnibus studet implere, de quo paulo inferius dicit: Homini bono, in conspectu suo dedit Deus sapientiam, et scientiam, et laetitiam. Salonius Viennensis, Expositio mystica in Ecclesiasten Source: Migne PL 53.997b-998a

Veranus: Why is it said 'The eyes of a wise man are in his head but a fool walks in darkness?' 1 Are the eyes of a fool not in his head? Salonius: In this passage eyes are not to be understood bodily but spiritually, that is, they are the eyes of the mind, that is, the sense and intention of the soul. The head signifies Christ, hence the Apostle says, 'The head of a man is Christ.' 2 The eyes of a wise man are in his head because the wise man directs all his intent to Christ, and in Christ he places himself, and he is always lifting up the eyes of his mind to heavenly things. The fool, however, walks in darkness because his sins set him in darkness and at the same time the love of this world blinds him, so that he despises heavenly things and therefore is not able, unlike the wise man, to raise his eyes to heaven, because he does not think on the things of God but the things of this world. Veranus: What, then, is the difference between the wise man and the fool? Salonius: This is the difference, the former is brightened and adorned with wisdom and enlightenment, but the latter is set in darkness and cast down. There is as great a distance between the wise man and the foolish man as between day and night, light and darkness. Veranus: How is there such a great distance between the wise man and the foolish man when one ruin comes upon both, for the learned die like the unlearned and the wise like the unwise? 3 Salonius: Although death is one and alike the wise man and the foolish man die, and often in this life the wise man suffers more afflictions than the fool, yet there shall not be the same remembrance of them in the future nor will they receive an equal reward, because on the day of judgement the wise man will be lifted up to the glory of the heavenly kingdom but the fool will be driven down to the endless torments of damnation. Veranus: Who, then, is this wise man who is as greatly different from the fool as light from darkness? Is it not the one who excels in the riches of philosophy and is resplendent in the eloquence of the liberal arts? Salonius: Often the wisdom of the world is an enemy of God, and carnal wisdom, even if adorned with the flowers of eloquence, has nothing spiritual in itself, and contains no fruit of perpetual beatitude. He is truly wise who loves the Lord, who keeps His commandments, and as much as it is possible for human fragility is zealous in fulfilling His will in all things, concerning which it is said a little below, 'To the man who is good in His sight God gives wisdom and knowledge and joy.' 4 Salonius of Geneva, A Spiritual Exposition of Ecclesiastes 1 Eccl 2.14 2 1 Cor 11.3 3 Eccl 2.14-15 4 Eccl 2.26

Considering Curiosity

Ego Ecclesiastes fui rex Israel in Jerusalem; et proposui in animo meo quaerere et investigare sapienter de omnibus quae fiunt sub sole. Hanc occupationem pessimam... Describitur curiositas philosophiae, primo quidem quoad considerationem rerum naturalium, et hoc quadruplici ratione. Curiositatem igitur in operibus naturae sive in consideratione operum divinorum hoc ordine describit. Primo innuitur considerantis idoneitas, secundo vero ipsius curiositas, tertio divini iudicii severitas, quarto concluditur vanitas. Primo igitur notatur considerantis idoneitas, cum dicit: Ego Ecclesiastes: quia in eo fuit sapientia, ideo se dicit Ecclesiasten, id est concionatorem: fuit etiam potentia, unde dicit: fui rex: fuit etiam pax, unde subdit: in Ierusalem, quae interpretatur visio pacis: Ecclesiastici quadragesimo septimo: Salomon imperavit in diebus pacis: primi Paralipomenon vigesimo secundo: Filius, qui nascetur tibi, erit pacificus; et quia hoc habebat, ideo nihil a consideratione retrahebat. Et proposui in animo meo etc. Tangitur hic secundum, scilicet ipsius curiositas, quia omnia voluit scire et subtiliter indagare. Proptereadicit: Et proposui in animo meo quaerere, scilicet ab alio, et investigare sapienter, per me ipsum; et hoc est curiositas; ad Romanos duodecimo: Non plus sapere, quam oportet sapere, sed sapere ad sobrietatem; unde Proverbiorum vigesimo quinto: Mel invenisti , comede quod sufficit tibi, ne forte satiatus evomas illud. De omnibus, quae fiunt sub sole. Ecce, maior curiositas, quia de omnibus; Ecclesiastici tertio: In supervacuis rebus noli scrutari multipliciter, et in pluribus operibus eius ne fueris curiosus; plurima enim super sensum hominum ostensa sunt tibi. Hanc occupationem pessimam etc. Tangitur hic tertium, scilicet divini iudicii severitas; quia divino iudicio propter peccatum primi parentis factum est, quod noslra vis rationalis ita libenter luxuriatur in cognitione terrenorum. Propter quod dicit: Hanc occupationem pessimam, quia non tantum est culpabilis, sed etiam poenalis; dedit Deus filiis hominum, id est dari permisit; vel ratione poenalitatis dedit iusto modo, ut occuparentur in ea, ac per hoc immemores essent suae salutis. Unde notandum est, quod est occupatio mala, quae est ex infirmitate; de hac Ecclesiastici quadragesimo, Occupatio magna creata est omnibus hominibus, et iugum grave super filios Adam a die exitus de ventre matris eorum usque in diem sepulturae in matrem omnium. Est occupatio peior , quae est ex ignorantia, de qua lob tertio: Obscurenteum tenebrae et umbra mortis; occupet eum caligo et involvatur amaritudine. Tertia est ex curiositate, et haec est pessima, et de hac loquitur hic Et notandum, quod « occupatio, ut dicit Hugo, est distractio mentis, quae avertit et distrahit et illaqueat animam , ut non possit cogitare ea quae salutis sunt. Curiositas vero est intellectus humani libidinosa prostitutio, passim quamlibet veritatem amplexans et cum ea adulterans, quia sola prima veritas est sponsa. Sanctus Bonaventura, Commentarius In Ecclesiasten, Caput I Source: Here, p17-18

I Ecclesiastes was king over Israel in Jerusalem, and I proposed in my mind to seek and search out wisely concerning all things that are done under the sun. This is the worst occupation... 1 Philosophical curiosity is now described, firstly as much as it is a consideration of natural things, and this in four ways. Now curiosity regarding the works of nature or Divine works is described in this order, firstly by consideration of ability, secondly regarding curiosity itself, thirdly as regards the severity of Divine judgement, and fourthly it concludes with vanity. Firstly then, the consideration of ability is noted, when he says, 'I Ecclesiastes,' because there is wisdom in him, therefore he calls himself Ecclesiastes, that is, preacher, and he was capable, hence he says 'I was king,' and he was at peace, hence he adds 'in Jerusalem,' which is understood as 'vision of peace.' In the forty seventh chapter of Ecclesiasticus, 'Solomon ruled in the days of peace.' In the twenty second chapter of the first book of Chronicles, 'The son who shall be born to you shall be a man of peace.' 2 and because he had all this, therefore nothing was beyond he consideration. And I proposed in my soul to seek and investigate wisely... This touches on the second matter, that is, curiosity itself, because he wishes to know everything and to examine it with subtlety. 'And I proposed in my soul to seek,' that is, from another and 'to investigate wisely,' that is, through myself, and this is curiosity. In the twelfth chapter of Romans: 'Do not know more than it is fitting for you to know, and know soberly.' In the twenty fifth chapter of Proverbs, 'You have found honey, eat it as it is enough for you, lest overindulging you vomit it up.' 3 Concerning everything that is beneath the sun. Behold, a greater curiosity, because it is about everything. In the third chapter of Ecclesiasticus, 'Do not care to scrutinise useless things overmuch, and in his many of works do not be curious, for many thing are shown to be beyond the understanding of man.' 4 This is the worst occupation. This touches on the third matter, that is the severity of Divine judgement, because on account of the Divine judgement of the sin of our first parents our power of reasoning thus gladly luxuriates in the knowledge of worldly things. Because of this it says, 'This is the worst occupation.' since not only is it blameworthy but even a punishment. God gave it to the sons of men, that is, He permitted it to be given, and the reason of the punishment He gave in a just manner is so that occupied with these things they shall be forgetful of the things of salvation. Let is be noted that there is a bad occupation which is a matter of infirmity, concerning which the fortieth chapter of Ecclesiasticus says, 'A great occupation has been created for every man and a heavy yoke is on the sons of Adam from the day he comes out of his mother's womb until the day he comes into his tomb, the mother of us all.' And there is a worse occupation which springs from ignorance, concerning which it is says in the third chapter of Job, 'Darkness and the shadow of death covers him; gloom envelops him and he is embroiled in bitterness.' 5 The third is from curiosity and this is the worst, and so it is said here. And let it be noted that Hugh says that occupation means a distraction of the mind when is turned away and diverted and the soul is ensnared so that it cannot think on the things of salvation. 6 Curiosity is a lustful prostitution of the understanding of the human intellect, which seizes on any truth anywhere and fornicates with it, because the sole first truth is the bride. 7 Saint Bonaventura, Commentary on Ecclesiastes, Chapter 1 1 Eccles 1.12-13 2 Sirach 47.15, Chron 22.9 3 Rom 12.3, Prov 25.16 4 Sirach 3.24-25 5 Sirach 40.1, Job 3.5 6 Hugh of Saint Victor In Eccle Homil 5 7 The Church

Questions And Deeds

Quis est autem iste... Tam magnus, de quo ego talia audio? Quaerit philosophari, et esse bonus. Non est enim quaerendum quis erat, sed cum Nathanaele accedendum et experiendum, ut sic sequeretur vestigia ipsius. Psal xxxiii: Accedite ad eum, et illuminamini: et facies vestrae non confundentur. Sed iste in sola ratione inquisitionis stare voluit, et non exercere opera, simile quid faciens istis, de quibus dicit Aristoteles in libro IV Ethicorum: Ad rationem confugientes, quaerunt philosophari et esse boni. Simile aliquid faciens infirmis, qui medicos quidem audiunt studiose, faciunt autem operandorum nihil. Et quemadmodum isti numquam bene habebunt corpus sic curati, ita nec illi bene habebunt animam sic philosophantes. Quid enim valet bona audire, et non facere? Jacob i: Qui auditor est verbi el non factor, comparabitur viro consideranti vultum nativitatis suae in speculo; consideravit enim se, et abiit, et statim oblitus est qualis fuerit. Sanctus Albertus Magnus Commentarium In Evangelium Lucam, Caput IX Source: Here p616

'Who is this...' 1 Is He so great 'concerning whom I hear such things?' he asks for his philosophising and to be good. But it must not be asked who He was, but with Nathanael one must draw near and one must experience 2 if one would follow in His way. In the thirty third Psalm, 'Come to Him and be enlightened and your faces shall not be confounded.' 3 But Herod who wished only to stand in the reason of questioning and not to exert himself in works is like the one of whom Aristotle speaks in the fourth book of his Ethics, 'Flying to reason they seek to philosophise and be good.' 4 He is similar to a sick man who carefully listens to physicians and then does nothing of what is prescribed. And as they will never have a body that is healthy, so they who philosophise in such a way shall never have a healthy soul. What good does it do to listen and not act? In the first chapter of the letter of James, 'He who hears the Word and does not do it shall be like a man who considers his own face in a mirror, and having considered it he goes away and instantly forgets what sort of man he was.' 5 Saint Albert The Great, Commentary On The Gospel of St Luke, Chapter 9 1 Lk 9.9 2 Jn 1.45-51 3 Ps 33.6 4 Aris Nic Eth 1105b 10-18 5 James 1.23-24

Knowing God

Confiteor tibi, Domine, Pater caeli et terrae, quia abscondisti haec a sapientibus et prudentibus, et revelasti ea parvulis... Qui sunt sapientes? Antiqui philosophi, et oratores, qui naturali sapientia literarum exercitatione exacuminati, de Dei natura quaerere contendebant, non Deum invenire desiderantes, sed altissima disserere cupientes, victi sunt ingenio, defecerunt sermone: in ultimo nihil se amplius invenire potuisse confessi sunt, nisi quia Deus incognoscibilis est. Et ut quid ergo tantum laborasti, si ignorans es, postquam requisisti, quemadmodum fueras, antequem quaereres? Sicut enim qui innavigabilem oceanum navigare se usurpat, dum non potest eum transire, necesse est, ut per eadem viam revertatur, unde ingressus est: sic et illi ab ignorantia coeperunt, et in ignorantia finierunt. O homo sapiens, magis autem insipiens! Deus invisibilis est, et quis potest videre,nisi ipse se videat? Serva ergo mandata Dei, sanctifica cor tuum, ita ut inhabitet Deus in te, et videas Deum. Magis autem non vides, sed Deus, qui est in te, videt te. Deus incomprehensibilis est. Quis enim potest comprehendere eum, nisi ipse se comprehendat? Serva ergo mandata Dei, sanctifica cor tuum, ita ut Deus habitet in te, et quotidie magis ac magis invenies Deum. Opus Imperfectum in Matthaeum, Homilia XXVIII Source: Migne PG 56.776

I confess to you Lord, Father of heaven and earth, that you have hidden these things from the wise and prudent, and revealed them to little ones... 1 Who are the wise? The ancient philosophers and orators who with their natural wisdom exerted themselves in the exercise of letters and disputed in the enquiry of the nature of God, not wishing to find God but desiring to speak cleverly of high things, who were by their own minds overthrown, and cast down in their words, for in the end they confessed they were not able to find out anything more than that God was unknowable. And why, therefore, did you labour so greatly, if being ignorant, after you had ceased, you were as you were before you sought? For like a man who has thrust himself forward to navigate the unnavigable ocean which he is not able to cross, and he must return on the same way he went out, so it is that those who have begun from ignorance shall end in ignorance. O wise man, how much more unwise! God cannot be seen, and who can see Him unless He shall see Himself? Therefore keep the commandments of God, sanctify your heart, so that God may dwell in you, and you will see God, or rather you will not see but God who is in you shall see for you. God is unknowable and who is able to know him unless Him who knows Himself? Therefore keep the commandments of God, sanctify your heart, so that God might dwell in you and with every day that passes you will find God more and more. Opus Imperfectum on Matthew, from Homily 28 1 Mt 11.25

The Trinity And Plato

Πορφύριος γάρ φησι, Πλάτωνος ἐκτιθέμενος δόξαν, ἄχρι τριῶν ὑποστάσεων τὴν τοῦ θείου προελθεῖν οὐσίαν, εἶναι δὲ τὸν μὲν ἀνωτάτω θεὸν τἀγαθόν, μετ' αὐτὸν δὲ καὶ δεύτερον τὸν δημιουργόν, τρίτον δὲ καὶ τὴν τοῦ κόσμου ψυχήν· ἄχρι γὰρ ψυχῆς τὴν θειότητα προελθεῖν. Ἰδοὺ δὴ σαφῶς ἐν τούτοις ἄχρι τριῶν ὑποστάσεων τὴν τοῦ θείου προελθεῖν οὐσίαν ἰσχυρίζεται· εἷς μὲν γάρ ἐστιν ὁ τῶν ὅλων Θεός, κατευρύνεται δὲ ὥσπερ ἡ περὶ αὐτοῦ γνῶσις εἰς ἁγίαν τε καὶ ὁμοούσιον Τριάδα, εἴς τε Πατέρα φημὶ καὶ Υἱὸν καὶ ἅγιον Πνεῦμα, ὃ καὶ ψυχὴν τοῦ κόσμου φησὶν ὁ Πλάτων· ζωοποιεῖ δὲ τὸ Πνεῦμα, καὶ πρόεισιν ἐκ ζῶντος Πατρὸς δι' Υἱοῦ, καὶ ἐν αὐτῷ ζῶμεν καὶ κινούμεθα καὶ ἐσμέν. Ἀληθεύει γὰρ ὁ Κύριος ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦς Χριστός· Τὸ Πνεῦμά ἐστι τὸ ζωοποιοῦν. Καὶ πάλιν ὁ αὐτὸς Πορφύριος περὶ Πλάτωνος· ∆ιὸ ἐν ἀπορρήτοις περὶ τούτων αἰνιττόμενός φησι· Περὶ τὸν βασιλέα πάντα ἐστί, καὶ ἐκείνου ἕνεκα πάντα, καὶ ἐκεῖνο αἴτιον πάντων καλῶν, δεύτερον δὲ περὶ τὰ δεύτερα, καὶ τρίτον περὶ τὰ τρίτα. Ὡς γὰρ πάντων μὲν περὶ τοὺς τρεῖς ὄντων θεούς, ἀλλ' ἤδη πρώτως μὲν περὶ τὸν πάντων βασιλέα, δευτέρως δὲ περὶ τὸν ἀπ' ἐκείνου θεόν, καὶ τρίτως περὶ τὸν ἀπὸ τούτου. ∆εδήλωκε δὲ ἐμφαίνων καὶ τὴν ἐξ ἀλλήλων ὑπόστασιν, ἀρχομένην ἀπὸ τοῦ βασιλέως, καὶ τὴν ὑπόβασιν καὶ ὕφεσιν τῶν μετὰ τὸν πρῶτον, διὰ τοῦ πρώτως καὶ δευτέρως καὶ τρίτως εἰπεῖν, καὶ ὅτι ἐξ ἑνὸς τὰ πάντα καὶ δι' αὐτοῦ σῴζεται. Τεθεώρηκε μὲν οὖν οὐχ ὑγιῶς εἰσάπαν, ἀλλὰ τοῖς τὰ Ἀρείου πεφρονηκόσιν ἐν ἴσῳ, διαιρεῖ καὶ ὑφίστησιν, ὑποκαθημένας τε ἀλλήλαις τὰς ὑποστάσεις εἰσφέρει, καὶ τρεῖς οἴεται θεοὺς εἶναι διῃρημένως τὴν ἁγίαν καὶ ὁμοούσιον Τριάδα. Πλὴν οὐκ ἠγνόηκεν ὁλοτρόπως τὸ ἀληθές, οἶμαι δὲ ὅτι κἂν ὑγιῶς ἔφη τε καὶ πεφρόνηκεν, ἐξήνεγκε δὲ καὶ εἰς τοὺς ἄλλους ἅπαντας τῆς περὶ Θεοῦ δόξης τὸ ἀρτίως ἔχον, εἰ μὴ τάχα που τὴν Ἀνύτου καὶ Μελήτου γραφὴν ἐδεδίει καὶ τὸ Σωκράτους κώνειον. Ἅγιος Κύριλλος Ἀλεξανδρείας, Προς Τα Του Ἐν Ἀθεοις Ιὀυλιανου, Λογος B' Source: Migne PG 76.556a

Expounding an opinion of Plato, Porphyry says, 'The divine substance extends even to three persons, the highest and best God, and after Him there is a second maker, and the third is the soul of the universe, for divinity extends even to soul.' And behold in these things it is manifest that he contends that the three Divine hypostases proceed from the Divine substance, since certainly the God of all things is one, but extended, according to his own understanding, into the holy and consubstantial Trinity, into the Father, I say, and the Son and the Holy Spirit, whom Plato calls the soul of the world, for the Spirit gives life and proceeds from the living Father through the Son, and 'in Him we live and move and have our being.' 1 For our truthful Lord, Jesus Christ, says 'The Spirit is He who gives life,' 2 And again the same Porphyry says of Plato: 'Where secretly intimating these things and speaking obscurely and in a mystery, he says: 'To the king everything is related, and all things are caused by him, and he is the cause of all beautiful things, and related to the second are second things, and third things are related to the third, 3 so that everything exists in relation to three gods, but firstly to the king of all things, and secondly to the god from him, and thirdly to the one who is from that one.' He declares here what the hypostases have from themselves, and that it begins from the king, and there is a declension and descent of things after the first, through the first and the second and the third, he says, for everything is from one, and through him they are preserved. Certainly not everything was seen correctly here, for thinking of these things in the same way of Arius, he divides and imposes inferiority, and he introduces subordination among those subsisting, and he thinks the holy and consubstantial Trinity is three distinct gods. But I think Plato was not ignorant of the whole truth, and would have thought of it and spoken of it rightly, and also published the real and genuine truths about God publicly and openly, but he perhaps feared the accusations of Anytus and Melitus and the hemlock of Socrates. Saint Cyril of Alexandria, Against Julian, Book 2 1 Acts 17.28 2 Jn 6.63 3 Plato Letter 2 312e

The Mustard Seed And Other Seeds

Simile est regnum coelorum grano sinapis etc. Regnum coelorum praesens Ecclesia dicitur, quae diversis figuris, non secundum se totam, sed secundum aliquam partem sui comparatur. Hic autem grano sinapis secundum fidem assimilatur, quod homo, id est Christus seminavit in agro, id est in cordibus credentium, quod minimum est omnibus seminibus. Fides enim nostra vilior omnibus doctrinis philosophicis videtur. Quid enim stultius sapientibus hujus mundi aestimabatur, quam in occisum et sepultum credere, visibilia contemnere, et invisibilibus iuhiare? Caetera autem semina, scilicet libri philosophorum excellere videntur, quia de maximarum rerum agunt subtilitate, et ornati sunt rhetorica compositione. Sed, ut ait Apostolus, quod infirmum est Dei, fortius est hominibus, ideo cum crescit in mente recipientis, et in toto mundo exaltatur, major apparet omnibus oleribus, et fit arbor, ita ut, etc. Scientiae philosophicae enim sunt olera, sed ad nullius utilitatis robur perveniunt. et ideo facile ex vanitate sua arescunt. Rami vero hujus arboris sunt partes fidei multiplices, in quibus habitant volucres coeli, id est animae fidelium delectantur et pascuntur, quae pennis virtutum ad coelestia volant. Unde dictum est: Quis dabit mihi pennas sicut columbae, et volabo, et requiescam? Anselmus Laudunensis, Enarrationes In Matthaeum, Caput XIII Source: Migne PL 162.1374d-1375b

The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed... 1 He speaks of the present Church by the use of different figures, for not in its totality but according to its different parts it has its comparisons. Here, then, the mustard seed is likened to faith, which a man, that is, Christ, sowed in a field, that is, in the hearts of the believers, and it is the smallest of all the seeds. Indeed our faith seems to be more valueless than all the teachings of the philosophers. What shall be judged more foolish by the wise of this world than to have belief in a man who was killed and buried, and to scorn visible things and to desire things unseen? And there are other seeds, that is, the books of the philosophers which seem to be excellent because they treat subtly of the greatest things and they are composed in an admirable style, but as the Apostle says, the weakness of God is stronger than men 2 therefore when our seed grows in the mind that receives it, it rises up amid the whole world, and it appears greater than all other herbs, and indeed is like a tree. The teachings of the philosophers are the other herbs, but the strength of their usefulness comes to nothing, and therefore on account of their vanity they wither away. But the branches of our tree are the many parts of the faith which with the wings of virtue fly off to heavenly things. Whence it has been said, 'Who shall give to me the wings of a dove, that I might fly away and be at peace?' 3 Anselm of Laon, Commentary On The Gospel of Saint Matthew, Chapter 6 1 Mt 13.31-32 2 1 Cor 1.25 3 Ps 54.7

Love And Knowledge

Ὡς μὲν οὖν ἀντακολουθοῦσιν ἀλλήλαις αἱ ἀρεταί, τί χρὴ λέγειν, ἐπιδεδειγμένου ἤδη ὡς πίστις μὲν ἐπὶ μετανοίᾳ ἐλπίδι τε, εὐλάβεια δὲ ἐπὶ πίστει, καὶ ἡ ἐν τούτοις ἐπιμονή τε καὶ ἄσκησις ἅμα μαθήσει συμπεραιοῦται εἰς ἀγάπην, ἣ δὲ τῇ γνώσει τελειοῦται; ἐκεῖνο δὲ ἐξ ἀνάγκης παρασημειωτέον ὡς μόνον τὸ θεῖον σοφὸν εἶναι φύσει νοεῖσθαι χρή· διὸ καὶ ἡ σοφία δύναμις θεοῦ ἡ διδάξασα τὴν ἀλήθειαν· κἀνταῦθάπου εἴληπται ἡ τελείωσις τῆς γνώσεως. Φιλεῖ δὲ καὶ ἀγαπᾷ τὴν ἀλήθειαν ὁ φιλόσοφος, ἐκ τοῦ θεράπων εἶναι γνήσιος δι' ἀγάπην ἤδη φίλος νομισθείς. Tαύτης δὲ ἀρχὴ τὸ θαυμάσαι τὰ πράγματα, ὡς Πλάτων ἐν Θεαιτήτῳ λέγει, καὶ Ματθίας ἐν ταῖς Παραδόσεσι παραινῶν θαύμασον τὰ παρόντα, βαθμὸν τοῦτον πρῶτον τῆς ἐπέκεινα γνώσεως ὑποτιθέμενος· ᾗ κἀν τῷ καθ' Ἑβραίους εὐαγγελίῳ "ὁ θαυμάσας βασιλεύσει" γέγραπται καὶ ὁ βασιλεύσας ἀναπαήσεται. Ἀδύνατον οὖν τὸν ἀμαθῆ, ἔστ' ἂν μένῃ ἀμαθής, φιλοσοφεῖν, τόν γε μὴ ἔννοιαν σοφίας εἰληφότα, φιλοσοφίας οὔσης ὀρέξεως τοῦ ὄντως ὄντος καὶ τῶν εἰς τοῦτο συντεινόντων μαθημάτων. Kἂν τὸ ποιεῖν καλῶς ᾖ τισιν ἐξησκημένον, ἀλλὰ τὸ ἐπίστασθαι, ὡς χρηστέον καὶ ποιητέον, καὶ συνεκπονητέον, καθὸ καὶ ὁμοιοῦταί τις θεῷ, θεῷ λέγω τῷ σωτῆρι, θεραπεύων τὸν τῶν ὅλων θεὸν διὰ τοῦ ἀρχιερέως λόγου, δι' οὗ καθορᾶται τὰ κατ' ἀλήθειαν καλὰ καὶ δίκαια. Eὐσέβεια ἔστι πρᾶξις ἑπομένη καὶ ἀκόλουθος θεῷ. Κλήμης ὁ Ἀλεξανδρεύς, Στρωματεων, Λογος Β’, Κεφ' Θ’ Source: Migne PG 9.979c-981b

As, then, the virtues follow one another, what need to speak of that which has been demonstrated already, that faith hopes through repentance, and fear through faith, and patience and practice in these, along with learning, culminate in love, which is perfected by knowledge? But what one must note is that the Divine alone must be thought as wise by nature. Therefore wisdom also, which has taught the truth, is the power of God, and in it the perfection of knowledge is embraced. The philosopher loves and likes the truth, being now changed from being a true servant to being considered a friend on account of his love. 1 The beginning of knowledge is a wondering at objects, as Plato says is in his Theaetetus, 2 and Matthias exhorting us in the Traditions, says, 'Wonder at what is before you,' laying this down as the first foundation of further knowledge. So also in the Gospel to the Hebrews it is written, 'He that wonders shall reign, and he that has reigned shall rest.' It is impossible, therefore, for an ignorant man, while he remains ignorant, to philosophise, since he has no grasp of the idea of wisdom and philosophy, which is an effort to grasp that which truly is, and the studies that lead to that. Which is not done to make a man cultivated, but so that there might be knowledge of what is beneficial and how to act and labour, insofar as one has a likeness to God, I mean God the Saviour, by the service of the God of all things through the High Priest, the Word, through whom is seen what is in truth good and right, and piety is conduct suitable for following God. Clement of Alexandria, The Stromata, Book 2, Chapter 9 1 Jn 15.15 2 Plato Theat 155d

Birth And Virtue

Econtratrio monendi sunt ignobiles, ut studeant esse nobiles virtutibus, quamvis non sint nobiles nobilitate sanguinis, quia humili loco nati multi clari fuerunt, prout ait Valerius libro iii capitulo viii. Pones exampla de talibus, sicut de Tullio Hostilio quem in cunabulis accepit agreste tugurium. Eiusdem adolescentia in pecora pascendo fuit occupata, validior etas. Imperium Romanum rexit et duplicavit, senectus in altissimo maiestatis fastigio fulsit. Et ibidem de aliis talibus. Similiter narrat qualiter humiliter nati, fulserunt nobilitate philosophie. Socrates inquit, non solum hominum consensu, verum etiam Appollonis oraculo sapientibus, iudicatus phantaice vel phanaretis matre obsistrice, et sophanisto patre marmorareo vel morario genitus ad clarissimum glorie lumine accessit, et si virtus per seipsum existimatur magister vite optimus. Et ibidem quam matrem eripides, aut quem patern Demostenes habuit, ipsorum quoque seculo ignotum fuit, alterius enim matrem cultellos vendidisse, omnium pene doctorum litere loquuntur. Sed quid aut illius tragita, aut huius oratoria vir clarus, natus ergo de humili genere, clarus tamen philosophia, et virtutibus satis magis est commendabilis nobili nato et alto genere, talibus carente. Johannes Gallensis, Communiloquium sive Summa Collationum, Tercia part: De informatione hominum quantum ad ea que omnibus sunt communia, Tercia distinctio, Captiulum tercium: De ignobilibus Source: here, p138

On the contrary the ignoble should be encouraged so that they become zealous to be noble by virtue, though they are not noble by nobility of blood, because many who were born in lowly position have become celebrated men, as Valerius says in book 3 chapter 8, giving examples of such men like Tullius Hostilius whom a rustic hut received into its cradle. His youth having been spent in pasturing cattle, he became strong in years, and ruling as king of the Romans, he doubled their territory, and in old age he shone with the most high majesty. 1 And in the some place he speaks of others. And likewise he tells of those who were humbly born and shone with the nobility of philosophy. Socrates, he says, not only by the agreement of men, but by the oracle of Apollo, was adjudged to be truly wise, he who was born of a mother, Phaenarete, who was a midwife, and his father, Sophroniscus, was a marble worker, or a stone cutter, but he came to the brightest light of glory, if virtue is judged to be the best teacher of life. And in the same place the mother of Euripides, and the father of Demosthenes, were also unknown to the world, for the mother of the former sold knives, 2 yet they are celebrated in nearly all of the works of those who are educated, for the first in tragedy and the other in oratory were great men, and both were born in a humble state, yet by philosophy they become famous, for indeed virtue is more commendable than a noble birth or a fine lineage which lacks such things. John of Wales, The Communiloquium, Third Part, On The Fashioning of Men In Things All Have In Common, Third Distinction, Third Chapter, On The Ignoble. 1 Valerius Maximus 3.4.2 2 Valerius Maximus 3.4e.1-2

Wisdom's Mixing

Κρατῆρα λόγων, ἡ τοῦ Θεοῦ σοφία, ὦ φιλομαθέστατε, τὰς θείας ἐκέρασε Γραφὰς, κρατῆρα, οὐ μέλιτος, οὐ γάλακτος, οὐκ οἴνου, ἀλλὰ παιδείας καὶ φιλοσοφίας πεπληρωμένον, καὶ θείοις χαρίσμασιν ἐστεμμένον, ὅστις τοὺς χρωμένους εἰς ἀρετὴν καὶ εὐσέβειαν προτρέπει, τῶν μὲν ἐπιγείων ἀμελεῖν παρασκευάζων, τῶν δὲ οὐρανίων εἴσω χωρεῖν· κρατῆρα, οὐ μεθόδους περιέχοντα, οὐδὲ σοφίσμτα, οὐδὲ φυσιολογίας ἀτόμους καὶ ἀπείριος, ἀλλ' ἔργα ἀνδρῶν ὀνομαστοτάτων καὶ ἐνδοξοτάτων, οἶς ὅμοια καὶ πράττων καὶ λέγων, ἀρετῆς κόσμον ἔξεις. Ἀλλ' οὐδε τῶν πταισάντων τοὺς βίους καὶ τὰς τιμωρίας ἀπεσιώτησαν· ὅπως μαθὼν, τὰ μὲν καλὰ ἔχιος, εἰ θέλοις, ζηλοῦν· τὰ δὲ φαῦλα, φεύγειν. Ὅσον μὲν οὖν χρήσιμον εἰς τὴν καθ' ἡμᾶς φιλοσοφίαν ἐκ τῆς ἐξωθεν παιδεύσεως, ὥσπερ ἡ μέλιττα, δρεψάμενος, πολλὰ γὰρ, εἰ γὰρ τὰληθῆ λέγειν, ἀρετῆς ἔνεκεν πεφιλοσοφήκασι, τὸ λοιπὸν ἄπαν χαίρειν ἔα· μάλιστα ὁρῶν αὐτοὺς κατ' ἀλλήλων διαπρύσιον κεκινηκότας πόλεμον. Ἀριστοτέλης μὲν γὰρ ἐπανέστη Πλάτωνι· οἱ Στωϊκοὶ δὲ πρὸς τοῦτον ἐφράξαντο. Τοῖς δὲ θείοις χρησμοῖς διὰ βίου δίδου σαυτόν. Οὕτω γὰρ καὶ ἐξ ἐκείνων καὶ ἐκ τούτων ὠφελούμενος, μέγὰ καὶ σαυτῷ καὶ πᾶσιν ἔσῇ χρῆμα. Ἐπειδὴ δὲ βούλε τί ἐστιν, Ἐκέρασεν ἡ σοφία τὸν ἑαυτῆς οἶνον, καὶ δι' ἤν αἰτίαν, οὐκ ἄκρατον αὐτὸν προϋθηκε, μάνθανε δι' ὀλίγων πολλά· Τὰ θεϊα καὶ ὑπερφυῆ παιδεύματα, λόγοις καὶ παραδείγμασι σωματικοῖς ἐκέρασεν. Οὐ γὰρ οἷον τε ἦν ἡμᾶς ἄλλως νοῆσαι. Τὴν γοῦν ἔνωσιν τῶν θείων νοημάτων καὶ τῶν ἐπιγείων λόγων, κρᾶσιν οὐκ ἀπεικότως ἐκάλεσε. Ἅγιος Ἰσίδωρος Του Πηλουσιώτου, Βιβλίον Δεύτερον, Ἐπιστολὴ Γ’ Τιμοθεῳ Αναγνωστῃ Source: Migne PG 78.457b-460a

The bowl of words, O lover of learning, which the wisdom of God mixes is the Divine Scriptures, a bowl, I say, not full with honey or milk or wine but with teaching and philosophy, and garnished with Divine grace, which things are used to exhort to virtue and piety, and prepare us to neglect the things of the world, and to seek the things of heaven. It is not a bowl, I say, of sophistry and deceit, nor of the absurd and interminable investigations of natures, but the deeds of most celebrated and most famous men. Which if you imitate with your actions and your words, you shall adorn yourself with virtue. But the lives and punishments of the wicked are not wrapped in silence, that learning of them it might please you to adhere to good things and fly from what is vile. As much as there is anything beneficial to be gathered up in other learning, so much it leads to our philosophy, for often, if we speak truly, they philosophised over virtue, but bid farewell to the rest, certainly seeing that they are the cause of endless combats with one another. Even Aristotle made attacks on Plato, and again the Stoics take up arms against him. Give yourself to the Divine oracles for your whole life. For if from these and from those, you take up what is useful, it will be great to you and beneficial to all. Since this is what is wished with, 'Wisdom has mixed her wine,' 1 and for this reason, that it not be beyond our capability. With few words receive much. So she mixes the teaching of the Divine and high nature with corporeal words and examples. For it was not possible that we could understand in any other way. Whence the joining of Divine thoughts with earthly words is not unreasonably called mixing. Saint Isidore of Pelusium, Book 2, Letter 3, to Timotheus the Lector

Philosophy And Happiness

Quidam autem Epicurei et Stoici philosophi, disserebant cum eo... Epicurei praeceptoris sui tarditatem secuti, felicitatem hominis in sola corporis voluptate, Stoici vero in sola animi virtute posuerunt. Qui inter se quidem dissidentes, Apostolum tamen unanimiter impugnant, eo quod hominem sicut ex anima et corpore subsistere, ita in utroque doceret beatum esse debere; sed hoc nec tempore praesenti, nec virtute humana, sed gratia Dei per Jesum Christum in resurrectionis gloria perficiendum. Sanctus Beda,Super acta Apostolorum Expositio, Caput XVII Source: Migne PL 92.979c

Certain Epicurean and Stoic philosophers entered into discussion with him... 1 The Epicureans, following the dullness of their teacher, placed the happiness of man in the pleasures of the body alone, but the Stoics only in the virtue of the soul, and because of this they disagreed among themselves. However the Apostle fought against both, for since man is constituted of soul and body, so he taught he should be blessed in both, and not in the present time, nor by human virtue, but by being perfected by the grace of God through Jesus Christ in the glory of the resurrection. Saint Bede, from the Commentary on the Acts of The Apostles, Chapter 17 1 Acts 17.18

Love Of Wisdom

Super salutem et speciem dilexi illam, et proposui pro luce habere illam, quoniam inextinguibile est lumen illius. Hic ostendit sapientiae aestimatae dilectionem. Et primo ostendit huius dilectionis magnitudinem; secundo, rationem: Venerunt autem mihi omnia bona pariter cum illa...Super salutem; Glossa: Corporis, scilicet interiorem; Psalmus: Quia vana salus hominis; et speciem, Glossa Rerum corporalium, scilicet exteriorem pulcritudinem, quia, Proverbiorum trigesimo primo: fallax gratia, et vana est pulcritudo; dilexi eam, sciliect sapientiam, quia quanto spiritus melior corpore et magis care diligendus, tanto spiritualia meliora sunt corporalibus et magis diligenda. Et eam in tantum dilexo, quod proposui pro luce habere illam, quae, inquam, lux est pulcherrimum et delectabilissimum et optimum inter corporalia, secundum Augustinum; sic sapientia inter spiritualia lux est animae; Ecclesiastici ultimo: In sapientia eius luxit anima mea, et ignorantias meas illuminavit; infra eodem: Speciosior est sole. Sequitur: Quoniam inexstinguibile est lumen illius, scilicet quantum est de se: infra eodem: Luci comparata, invenitur prior, illi enim succedit nox. Sanctus Bonaventura, Commentarius In Librum Sapientiae, Caput VII Source: Here, 383c-d

'I loved her above health and beauty, and chose to have her instead of light, for her light cannot be extinguished.' 1 Here he shows love for the wisdom that he has valued. Firstly he shows the greatness of this love, secondly the cause: 'All goods came to me together with her...' 2 'Above health.' Gloss: 'of the body' that is, the interior. The Psalm: 'For vain is the help of man.' 3 And above beauty, Gloss: 'Of what concerns the body',that is, exterior beauty, because, in the thirty first chapter of Proverbs: 'Favour is deceitful and beauty is vain' 4 'I loved her,' that is, wisdom, because as much as the spirit is better than the body, so she should be loved more dearly, and likewise spiritual things should be loved better and more than bodily things. And I loved her so much that 'I chose to have her instead of light,' she who is, I say, the most beautiful, most delightful and best compared to bodily lights, according to Augustine. 5 In this way wisdom, in spiritual matters, is the light of the soul. In the last chapter of Ecclesiasticus: 'In its wisdom my soul lamented and it enlightened my ignorance,' 6 And in the same chapter of Wisdom below: 'She is more beautiful than the sun.' It follows: 'For her light cannot be extinguished,' that is, as much as it is from herself. In the same chapter below: 'Being compared with the light, she is found before it, for night succeeds the former.' 7 Saint Bonaventura, Commentary On Wisdom, Chapter 7 1 Wisd 7.10 2 Wisd 7.11 3 Ps 59.13 4 Prov 31.30 5 Aug Confes 10.34 6 Sirach 51.26 7 Wisd 7.29-30

John And Philosophy

Οὗτος δὴ οὖν ὁ ἁλιεὺς, ὁ περὶ λίμνας στρεφόμενος καὶ δίκτυα καὶ ἰχθῦς, ὁ ἀπὸ Βηθσαϊδὰ τῆς Γαλιλαίας, ὁ πατρὸς ἁλιέως πένητος, καὶ πένητος πενίαν τὴν ἐσχάτην, ὁ ἰδιώτης ἰδιωτείαν καὶ ταύτην τὴν ἐσχάτην, ὁ γράμματα μήτε πρότερον μαθὼν, μήτε ὕστερον μετὰ τὸ συγγενέσθαι τῷ Χριστῷ, ἴδωμεν τί φθέγγεται, καὶ περὶ τίνων ἡμῖν διαλέγεται. Ἆρα περὶ τῶν ἐν ἀγροῖς; περὶ τῶν ἐν ποταμοῖς; περὶ συμβολαίων ἰχθύων; ταῦτα γὰρ ἴσως παρὰ ἁλιέως ἀκούσεσθαι προσδοκᾷ τις. Ἀλλὰ μὴ δείσητε· τούτων μὲν γὰρ οὐδὲν ἀκουσόμεθα· τὰ δὲ ἐν τοῖς οὐρανοῖς, καὶ ἃ μηδεὶς μηδέπω ἔμαθε πρὸ τούτου. Οὕτω γὰρ ἡμῖν ὑψηλὰ δόγματα, καὶ πολιτείαν ἀρίστην, καὶ φιλοσοφίαν ἥκει κομίζων, ὡς εἰκὸς τὸν ἀπ' αὐτῶν φθεγγόμενον τῶν τοῦ Πνεύματος θησαυρῶν, ὡς ἀπ' αὐτῶν ἄρτι παραγενόμενος τῶν οὐρανῶν· μᾶλλον δὲ οὐδὲ τοὺς ἐκεῖ πάντας εἰκὸς ἦν εἰδέναι, ὅπερ καὶ ἔφθην εἰπών. Ταῦτα οὖν ἁλιέως, εἰπέ μοι; ῥήτορος δὲ ὅλως; σοφιστοῦ δὲ ἢ φιλοσόφου; παντὸς δὲ τοῦ τὴν ἔξωθεν πεπαιδευμένου σοφίαν; Οὐδαμῶς. Οὐ γὰρ ἀνθρωπίνης ἁπλῶς ψυχῆς περὶ τῆς ἀκηράτου καὶ μακαρίας ἐκείνης φύσεως τοιαῦτα φιλοσοφεῖν, περὶ τῶν μετ' ἐκείνην δυνάμεων, περὶ ἀθανασίας καὶ ζωῆς ἀπείρου, περὶ φύσεως σωμάτων θνητῶν τε καὶ ἀθανάτων ὕστερον ἐσομένων, περὶ κολάσεως, περὶ τοῦ μέλλοντος δικαστηρίου, περὶ τῶν ἐσομένων εὐθυνῶν, τῶν ἐν ῥήμασι, τῶν ἐν πράξεσι, τῶν ἐν λογισμοῖς καὶ διανοίᾳ· καὶ τί μὲν ἄνθρωπος, εἰδέναι, τί δὲ κόσμος· καὶ τί μὲν ὁ ὄντως ἄνθρωπος, τί δὲ ὁ δοκῶν μὲν εἶναι, οὐκ ὢν δέ· τί κακία, καὶ τί ἀρετή. Τούτων γὰρ ἔνια ἐζήτησαν μὲν οἱ περὶ Πλάτωνα καὶ Πυθαγόραν· τῶν γὰρ ἄλλων οὐδὲ ἁπλῶς μνημονευτέον ἡμῖν φιλοσόφων· οὕτω καταγέλαστοι ἐντεῦθεν μεθ' ὑπερβολῆς γεγόνασιν ἅπαντες. Οἱ δὲ τῶν ἄλλων θαυμασθέντες πλέον παρ' αὐτοῖς, καὶ πιστευθέντες εἶναι κορυφαῖοι τῆς ἐπιστήμης ἐκείνης, οὗτοι μάλιστα τῶν ἄλλων εἰσίν· οἳ καὶ πολιτείας μὲν ἕνεκεν καὶ νόμων συνθέντες τινὰ ἔγραψαν· ὅμως δὲ ἐν ἅπασι παίδων αἰσχρότερον κατεγελάσθησαν. Τάς τε γὰρ γυναῖκας κοινὰς ἅπασι ποιοῦντες, καὶ τὸν βίον αὐτὸν ἀνατρέποντες, καὶ τὸ σεμνὸν διαφθείροντες τοῦ γάμου, καὶ ἕτερα τοιαῦτα καταγέλαστα νομοθετοῦντες, οὕτω πάντα τὸν βίον αὐτῶν ἀνάλωσαν. Δογμάτων δὲ ἕνεκεν τῶν περὶ ψυχῆς, οὐδὲ ὑπερβολήν τινα κατέλιπον αἰσχύνης λοιπὸν, μυίας, καὶ κώνωπας, καὶ θάμνους τὰς τῶν ἀνθρώπων λέγοντες γίνεσθαι ψυχὰς, καὶ τὸν Θεὸν αὐτὸν ψυχὴν εἶναι φάσκοντες, καὶ ἕτερα ἄττα τινὰ τοιαῦτα ἀσχημονοῦντες. Καὶ οὐ τοῦτο μόνον ἐστὶ τὸ κατηγορίας ἄξιον· ἀλλὰ καὶ ὁ πολὺς αὐτῶν τῶν λόγων εὔριπος. Καθάπερ γὰρ ἐν εὐρίπῳ τῇδε κἀκεῖσε περιφερόμενοι, οὕτως οὐδέποτε ἐπὶ τῶν αὐτῶν ἑστήκεσαν, ἅτε ἀπὸ τῶν ἀδήλων καὶ ἐπισφαλῶν λογισμῶν πάντα φθεγγόμενοι. Ἀλλ' οὐχ ὁ ἁλιεὺς οὗτος οὕτως· ἀλλ' ἅπαντα μετὰ ἀσφαλείας φθέγγεται, καὶ ὥσπερ ἐπὶ πέτρας ἑστηκὼς, οὐδαμοῦ περιτρέπεται. Ἐν αὐτοῖς γὰρ τοῖς ἀδύτοις γενέσθαι καταξιωθεὶς, καὶ τὸν πάντων Δεσπότην ἐν ἑαυτῷ λαλοῦντα ἔχων, οὐδὲν ἀνθρώπινον ἔπασχεν·ἐκεῖνοι δὲ ὥσπερ οἱ τῶν μὲν βασιλείων οὐδὲ ὄναρ ἐπιβῆναι καταξιωθέντες, ἔξω δὲ ἐπ' ἀγορᾶς μετὰ τῶν ἄλλων διατρίβοντες ἀνθρώπων, καὶ ἀπὸ τῆς ἰδίας διανοίας καταστοχαζόμενοι τῶν ἀοράτων, τὴν πολλὴν ἐπλανήθησαν πλάνην, περὶ τῶν ἀῤῥήτων διαλεχθῆναι θελήσαντες, καὶ καθάπερ τυφλοὶ καὶ μεθύοντες, καὶ ἐν αὐτῇ τῇ πλάνῃ ἀλλήλοις προσέῤῥηξαν·οὐκ ἀλλήλοις δὲ μόνον, ἀλλὰ καὶ ἑαυτοῖς, πολλαχοῦ καὶ περὶ τῶν αὐτῶν ἀεὶ μετατιθέμενοι.Ὁ δὲ ἀγράμματος οὗτος, ὁ ἰδιώτης, ὁ ἀπὸ Βηθσαϊδὰ, ὁ Ζεβεδαίου παῖς· κἂν μυριάκις καταγελῶσιν Ἕλληνες τῆς τῶν ὀνομάτων ἀγροικίας, οὐδὲν ἧττον μετὰ πλείονος αὐτὰ τῆς παῤῥησίας ἐρῶ· ὅσῳ γὰρ ἂν τὸ ἔθνος αὐτοῖς βάρβαρον φαίνηται καὶ τῆς Ἑλληνικῆς ἀπέχον παιδεύσεως, τοσούτῳ λαμπρότερα τὰ ἡμέτερα φανεῖται. Ὅταν γὰρ ὁ βάρβαρος καὶ ἀμαθὴς τοιαῦτα φθέγγηται, ἃ μηδεὶς τῶν ἐπὶ γῆς ἀνθρώπων συνεῖδέ ποτε, καὶ μὴ φθέγγηται μόνον, ἀλλὰ καὶ πείθῃ·καίτοι εἰ καὶ τοῦτο μόνον ἦν, μέγα τὸ θαῦμα ἦν· νῦν δὲ πρὸς τούτῳ καὶ ἕτερον τούτου μεῖζον παρέχῃ τεκμήριον, τοῦ θεόπνευστα εἶναι τὰ λεγόμενα, τὸ τοὺς ἀκούοντας πείθειν ἅπαντας διὰ τοῦ χρόνου παντὸς, τίς οὐ θαυμάσεται τὴν ἐνοικοῦσαν αὐτῷ δύναμιν; Καὶ γὰρ καὶ τοῦτο μέγιστον, ὅπερ ἔφην, τεκμήριον τοῦ μηδὲν οἴκοθεν αὐτὸν νομοθετεῖν. Οὗτος δὴ οὖν ὁ βάρβαρος, τῇ μὲν τοῦ εὐαγγελίου γραφῇ τὴν οἰκουμένην κατέλαβεν ἅπασαν, τῷ δὲ σώματι μέσην κατέσχε τὴν Ἀσίαν, ἔνθα τὸ παλαιὸν ἐφιλοσόφουν οἱ τῆς Ἑλληνικῆς συμμορίας ἅπαντες, κἀκεῖθεν τοῖς δαίμοσίν ἐστι φοβερὸς, ἐν μέσῳ τῶν ἐχθρῶν διαλάμπων, καὶ τὸν ζόφον αὐτῶν σβεννὺς, καὶ τὴν ἀκρόπολιν τῶν δαιμόνων καταλύων· τῇ δὲ ψυχῇ πρὸς τὸν χῶρον ἀνεχώρησεν ἐκεῖνον, τὸν ἁρμόττοντα τῷ τὰ τοιαῦτα ἐργασαμένῳ. Ἅγιος Ἰωάννης ὁ Χρυσόστομος, Υπόμνημα Εἰς τὸν ἅγιον Ἰωάννην τὸν Ἀπόστολον και Εὑαγγελιστην, Ὁμιλία Β´ Source: Migne PG 59.30-31

This fisherman, then, whose business concerned lakes and nets and fish, this man of Bethsaida of Galilee, this son of a poor fisherman, even poor to the last degree, this uneducated man, even ignorant to the last degree, who never learned letters before or after he accompanied Christ, let us see what he speaks and what he converses with us about. Is it things of the field? Is it things of rivers? It is about the fish-trade? For these things, perhaps, one expects to hear from a fisherman. But do not fret, we shall hear nothing of such things from this man but rather the things of heaven, even what no one had ever learned before. For he has come bringing to us sublime teaching and the best way of life and philosophy, as might be expected from one who speaks from the very treasures of the Spirit, as though just come from those heavens, and indeed things which not even all there would have known, as I have said. Tell me, are these the things of a fisherman? Do they belong to a orator at all? To a sophist or philosopher? To all those educated in the wisdom apart from us? Not at all. The human soul is utterly unable thus to philosophize on that pure and blessed nature, on the powers that it possesses, on immortality and endless life, on the nature of mortal bodies that shall later be immortal, on punishment and future judgment, on the examinations that there shall be of deeds and words, and of thoughts and meditations, on what is man and what the world, on what is man in truth and what seems to be man but is not, what is the nature of virtue and what of vice. For some of these things the disciples of Plato and Pythagoras looked into, and the other philosophers we need not call to mind at all, since they have all on this point been so excessively ridiculous, and those who have been in greater esteem among them than the rest and who have been considered the leading men in this discipline, more than the others, they have composed and written somewhat on the subject of politics and law, and all  have been more shamefully ridiculous than children. For they have spent their time in making women common to all men, in overthrowing the order of life, and in destroying the honor of marriage, and likewise with every activity of life. As for their teaching on the soul, there is nothing excessively shameful that they have not said, saying that the souls of men become flies and gnats and bushes, and that God Himself is a soul, and other similar disgraceful things. And it is not this alone in them which is worthy of reproof, but most of their works are like the Euripos strait; 1 for as those carried here and there by the Euripos, so they stand firm on nothing, but propose everything on obscure and deceitful arguments. But not so this fisherman, for all he says is steadfast, and as if standing on a rock, he never moves. For since he has been deemed worthy of the innermost chambers and has the Lord of all speaking within him, he is not oppressed by that which is human, whereas they, just as those who are not held worthy to enter the royal palace, even in a dream, must spend their time outside in the marketplace with other men, and from their own imagination guess at things unseen, and they are gravely deceived by that, yet wishing to speak of things unspeakable, they crash against one other in their delusions like blind or drunken men, and not only against each other, but even against themselves, because they continually shift their opinion concerning the same things. But not this unlettered man, this ignorant man, this native of Bethsaida, the son of Zebedee. And though the Greeks mock ten thousand times the rusticity of these names, I shall speak them with greater boldness. For the more barbarous his nation seems to them and the more removed from Greek teaching, so much more the brighter does what we have appear. For when a barbarian and an untaught person speaks such things that no man on earth ever knew, and does not only speak them, though if this were the only thing it would be a great marvel, but with this gives another and a greater proof that what he says is divinely inspired, namely, the persuasion of those who hear him through the ages, who will not wonder at the power that dwells in him? For this is the greatest proof, as I said, that he lays down no laws from himself. This barbarian then, with his writing of his Gospel, has taken possession of all the civilised world, and with his body he has taken possession of the centre of Asia, where the Greek party of old philosophised, 2 becoming a bane to those spirits, in the midst of his enemies shining forth, scattering their darkness, and casting down the stronghold of demons, though in soul he has withdrawn to that place that befits one who has done such things. Saint John Chrysostom, Commentary On The Gospel of Saint John, Homily 2 1 A narrow strait subject to strong tidal currents separating the island of Euboea from Boeotia in mainland Greece 2 The Presocratic Ionic Philosophers

Beyond Words

Τὸν γὰρ πατέρα καὶ ποιητὴν τοῦδε τοῦ παντὸς εὑρεῖν τε ἔργον καὶ εὑρόντα εἰς πάντας ἐξειπεῖν ἀδύνατον. Ῥητὸν γὰρ οὐδαμῶς ἐστιν ὡς τἄλλα μαθήματα, ὁ φιλαλήθης λέγει Πλάτων. Ἀκήκοεν γὰρ εὖ μάλα ὡς ὁ πάνσοφος Μωυσῆς εἰς τὸ ὄρος ἀνιὼν, διὰ τὴν ἁγίαν θεωρίαν ἐπὶ τὴν κορυφὴν τῶν νοητῶν, ἀναγκαίως διαστέλλεται μὴ τὸν πάντα λαὸν συναναβαίνειν ἑαυτῷ· καὶ ὅταν λέγῃ ἡ γραφὴ εἰσῆλθεν δὲ Μωυσῆς εἰς τὸν γνόφον οὗ ἦν ὁ θεός, τοῦτο δηλοῖ τοῖς συνιέναι δυναμένοις, ὡς ὁ θεὸς ἀόρατός ἐστι καὶ ἄρρητος, γνόφος δὲ ὡς ἀληθῶς ἡ τῶν πολλῶν ἀπιστία τε καὶ ἄγνοια τῇ αὐγῇ τῆς ἀληθείας ἐπίπροσθε φέρεται. Ὀρφεύς τε αὖ ὁ θεολόγος ἐντεῦθεν ὠφελημένος εἰπών· εἷς ἔστ', αὐτοτελής, ἑνὸς ἔκγονα πάντα τέτυκται ἢ πέφυκεν, γράφεται γὰρ καὶ οὕτως, ἐπιφέρει· οὐδέ τις αὐτὸν εἰσοράᾳ θνητῶν, αὐτὸς δέ γε πάντας ὁρᾶται. σαφέστερον δὲ ἐπιλέγει· αὐτὸν δ' οὐχ ὁρόω· περὶ γὰρ νέφος ἐστήρικται. Πᾶσιν γὰρ θνητοῖς θνηταὶ κόραι εἰσὶν ἐν ὄσσοις μικραί, ἐπεὶ σάρκες τε καὶ ὀστέα ἐμπεφυῖα ἐμπεφύασιν. Mαρτυρήσει τοῖς εἰρημένοις ὁ ἀπόστολος, οἶδα λέγων ἄνθρωπον ἐν Χριστῷ ἁρπαγέντα ἕως τρίτου οὐρανοῦ, κἀκεῖθεν εἰς τὸν παράδεισον, ὃς ἤκουσεν ἄρρητα ῥήματα, ἃ οὐκ ἐξὸν ἀνθρώπῳ λαλῆσαι, τὸ ἄρρητον τοῦ θεοῦ οὕτως αἰνισσόμενος, οὐ νόμῳ καὶ φόβῳ παραγγελίας τινὸς τὸ οὐκ ἐξὸν προστιθείς, δυνάμει δὲ ἀνθρωπείᾳ ἄφθεγκτον εἶναι τὸ θεῖον μηνύων, εἴ γε ὑπὲρ οὐρανὸν τὸν τρίτον ἄρχεται λαλεῖσθαι, ὡς θέμις, τοῖς ἐκεῖ μυσταγωγοῦσιν τὰς ἐξειλεγμένας ψυχάς. Oἶδα γὰρ ἐγὼ καὶ παρὰ Πλάτωνι, τὰ γὰρ ἐκ τῆς βαρβάρου φιλοσοφίας παραδείγματα πολλὰ ὄντα ὑπερτίθεταί μοι νῦν ἡ γραφή, κατὰ τὰς πρώτας ὑποσχέσεις τὸν καιρὸν ἀναμένουσα, πολλοὺς οὐρανοὺς νοουμένους. Ἀπορήσας γοῦν ἐν τῷ Τιμαίῳ, εἰ χρὴ πλείονας κόσμους ἢ τοῦτον ἕνα νομίζειν, ἀδιαφορεῖ περὶ τὰ ὀνόματα, συνωνύμως κόσμον τε καὶ οὐρανὸν ἀποκαλῶν· τὰ δὲ τῆς λέξεως ὧδε ἔχει· πότερον οὖν ὀρθῶς ἕνα οὐρανὸν εἰρήκαμεν ἢ πολλοὺς καὶ ἀπείρους ἦν λέγειν ὀρθότερον; ἕνα, εἴπερ κατὰ τὸ παράδειγμα ἔσται δεδημιουργημένος. Ἀλλὰ κἀν τῇ πρὸς Κορινθίους Ῥωμαίων ἐπιστολῇ ὠκεανὸς ἀπέραντος ἀνθρώποις γέγραπται καὶ οἱ μετ' αὐτὸν κόσμοι. Ἀκολούθως τοίνυν πάλιν ἐπιφθέγγεται ὢ βάθος πλούτου καὶ σοφίας καὶ γνώσεως θεοῦ ὁ γενναῖος ἀπόστολος. Kαὶ μή τι τοῦτ' ἦν ὃ ᾐνίσσετο ὁ προφήτης, ἐγκρυφίας κελεύων ποιεῖν ἀζύμους, μηνύων ὅτι τὸν ἱερὸν ὡς ἀληθῶς περὶ τοῦ ἀγενήτου καὶ τῶν δυνάμεων αὐτοῦ μύστην λόγον ἐπικεκρύφθαι δεῖ. Βεβαιῶν ταῦτα ἐν τῇ πρὸς Κορινθίους ἐπιστολῇ ὁ ἀπόστολος ἀναφανδὸν εἴρηκεν· σοφίαν δὲ λαλοῦμεν ἐν τοῖς τελείοις, σοφίαν δὲ οὐ τοῦ αἰῶνος τούτου οὐδὲ τῶν ἀρχόντων τοῦ αἰῶνος τούτου τῶν καταργουμένων· ἀλλὰ λαλοῦμεν θεοῦ σοφίαν ἐν μυστηρίῳ, τὴν ἀποκεκρυμμένην. Kαὶ πάλιν ἀλλαχοῦ λέγει· εἰς ἐπίγνωσιν τοῦ μυστηρίου τοῦ θεοῦ ἐν Χριστῷ, ἐν ᾧ εἰσι πάντες οἱ θησαυροὶ τῆς σοφίας καὶ τῆς γνώσεως ἀπόκρυφοι. Ἐπισφραγίζεται ταῦτα ὁ σωτὴρ ἡμῶν αὐτὸς ὧδέ πως λέγων· ὑμῖν δέδοται γνῶναι τὸ μυστήριον τῆς βασιλείας τῶν οὐρανῶν. Kαὶ πάλιν φησὶ τὸ εὐαγγέλιον, ὡς ὁ σωτὴρ ἡμῶν ἔλεγεν τοῖς ἀποστόλοις τὸν λόγον ἐν μυστηρίῳ· Kαὶ γὰρ ἡ προφητεία περὶ αὐτοῦ φησιν· ἀνοίξει ἐν παραβολαῖς τὸ στόμα αὐτοῦ καὶ ἐξερεύξεται τὰ ἀπὸ καταβολῆς κόσμου κεκρυμμένα. Ἤδη δὲ καὶ διὰ τῆς περὶ τὴν ζύμην παραβολῆς τὴν ἐπίκρυψιν ὁ Kύριος δηλοῖ· φησὶ γάρ· ὁμοία ἐστὶν ἡ βασιλεία τῶν οὐρανῶν ζύμῃ, ἣν λαβοῦσα γυνὴ ἐνέκρυψεν εἰς ἀλεύρου σάτα τρία, ἕως οὗ ἐζυμώθη ὅλον. Ἤτοι γὰρ ἡ τριμερὴς καθ' ὑπακοὴν σῴζεται ψυχὴ διὰ τὴν ἐγκρυβεῖσαν αὐτῇ κατὰ τὴν πίστιν πνευματικὴν δύναμιν, ἢ ὅτι ἡ ἰσχὺς τοῦ λόγου ἡ δοθεῖσα ἡμῖν, σύντονος οὖσα καὶ δυνατή, πάντα τὸν καταδεξάμενον καὶ ἐντὸς ἑαυτοῦ κτησάμενον αὐτὴν ἐπικεκρυμμένως τε καὶ ἀφανῶς πρὸς ἑαυτὴν ἕλκει καὶ τὸ πᾶν αὐτοῦ σύστημα εἰς ἑνότητα συνάγει. Σοφώτατα τοίνυν γέγραπται τῷ Σόλωνι ταῦτα περὶ θεοῦ· γνωμοσύνης δ' ἀφανὲς χαλεπώτατόν ἐστι νοῆσαι μέτρον, ὃ δὴ πάντων πείρατα μοῦνον ἔχει. Tὸ γάρ τοι θεῖον, ὁ Ἀκραγωντῖνός φησι ποιητής, οὐκ ἔστιν πελάσασθαι ἐν ὀφθαλμοῖσιν ἐφικτὸν ἡμετέροις ἢ χερσὶ λαβεῖν, ᾗπέρ τε μεγίστη πειθοῦς ἀνθρώποισιν ἁμαξιτὸς εἰς φρένα πίπτει. Kαὶ Ἰωάννης ὁ ἀπόστολος· θεὸν οὐδεὶς ἑώρακεν πώποτε· ὁ μονογενὴς θεός, ὁ ὢν εἰς τὸν κόλπον τοῦ πατρός, ἐκεῖνος ἐξηγήσατο, τὸ ἀόρατον καὶ ἄρρητον κόλπον ὀνομάσας θεοῦ· βυθὸν δ' αὐτὸν κεκλήκασιν ἐντεῦθεν τινὲς ὡς ἂν περιειληφότα καὶ ἐγκολπισάμενον τὰ πάντα ἀνέφικτόν τε καὶ ἀπέραντον. Κλήμης ὁ Ἀλεξανδρεύς, Στρωματεων, Λογος Ε' Κεφ ΙΒ' Source: Migne PG 9.116b-121a

'For to discover the Father and Maker of all things and having found Him to declare it to all it is impossible. For this is not capable of expression at all, like the other things of instruction,' says the truth-loving Plato. 1 For he had heard well that the all-wise Moses, ascending the mount for holy contemplation on the summit of intellectual objects, necessarily commanded that the whole people must not accompany him. And when Scripture says, 'Moses entered into the darkness where God was,' 2 this clearly shows to those who are able to understand that God is invisible and beyond words. And the darkness, which, in truth, is the unbelief and ignorance of the multitude, obstructs the ray of truth. And Orpheus the theologian, aided by this, says: 'One is perfect in himself, and all things are made the progeny of one,' or, 'are born.' Thus it is written, he continues: 'No mortal has seen Him, but He sees all.' And he adds more clearly: 'I see Him not; around a cloud has been set. In mortal eyes mortal pupils are small, Since only flesh and bones grow there.' To these statements the Apostle will testify: 'I know a man in Christ, caught up into the third heaven, and thence into Paradise, who heard unutterable words which it is not permitted a man to speak,' 3 thus intimating the inexpressibility of God, and indicating that neither by law or fear is the declaration prohibited but that what is Divine is unutterable by human ability; for if indeed he begins to speak above the third heaven, so it is right for the elect souls of the mysteries there. For I know what is in Plato, and the examples of the barbarian philosophy, which are many, are suggested to me now by the composition which in according to the promises given has waited for the suitable time, and doubting in the Timaeus whether we should think numerous worlds to be understood by many heavens, or this one, he makes no distinction concerning the names, calling the world and heaven by the same. The words of his statement are: 'Have we, then, spoken correctly of one heaven, or was it more correct to speak of many and infinite? One, if indeed it was created according to the model.' 4 Further, in the Letter of the Romans to the Corinthians it is written, 'An ocean without bounds to men and the worlds after it.' 5 Consequently, therefore, the noble Apostle exclaims, 'Oh the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and the knowledge of God!' 6 And was it not this which the prophet hinted at, when he ordered unleavened cakes to be made, intimating that the truly sacred mystic word, concerning the Unbegotten and His powers, should be concealed? Confirming which things, in the letter to the Corinthians the Apostle openly said: 'But we speak wisdom among those who are perfect, but not the wisdom of this world, or of the princes of this world, which perishes, but we speak the wisdom of God hidden in mystery.' 7 And again in another place he says: 'To the acknowledgment of the mystery of God in Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.' 8 These things our Saviour Himself gives the seal to when He says: 'To you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven.' 9 And again the Gospel says that our Saviour spoke to the Apostles the word in a mystery. For indeed the prophecy says of Him: 'He will open His mouth in parables, and will utter things kept secret from the foundation of the world.' 10 And now in the parable of the leaven, the Lord reveals concealment, for He says, 'The kingdom of heaven is like leaven, which a woman took and hid in three measures of meal, until the whole was leavened.' 11 For the tripartite soul is saved according to obedience, through the spiritual power hidden in it according to faith, or because the power of the word which is given to us, being firm and strong, draws to itself secretly and invisibly every one who receives it, and keeps it within himself, and brings the whole system into unity. Wisely, then, Solon has written respecting God: 'The mind's invisible measure it is most difficult to know Which alone the limits of all things holds.' For the Divine, says the poet of Agrigento, 12 'One cannot approach it with the eyes, We cannot grasp it with our hands; but persuasion Is the great highway that leads to men's minds.' And John the Apostle says: 'No man has ever seen God. The only-begotten God, who is in the bosom of the Father, He has declared Him,' 13 calling invisibility and ineffableness the bosom of God. Hence some have called it the Depth, as containing and embracing all things, inaccessible and boundless. Clement of Alexandria, The Stromata, Book 5 Chap 12 1 Plato Timeaus 28c 2 Exod 22.21 3 2 Cor 12.2-4 4 Plato Timeaus 31a 5 1 Clem 20 6 Rom 11.33 7 1 Cor 2.6-7 8 Colos 2.2-3 9 Mt 13.11 10 Ps 77.2 11 Mt 13.33 12 Empedocles 13 Jn 1.18

The Interior Heaven

Ἰδοὺ λοιπὸν καὶ ἡμεῖς οἱ τεθέντες ἐν λάκκῳ ἀγνωσίας βαθυτάτῳ καὶ σκοτεινοῖς πάθεσι, καὶ σκιᾷ θανάτου τούτου τοῦ σώματος, περὶ τοῦ ἐπιγείου οὐρανοῦ ἐκ θρασύτητος φιλοσοφεῖν ἀρχόμεθα. Ἔχει μὲν γὰρ τὸ στερέωμα τοὺς ἀστέρας κάλλος, ἡ δὲ ἀπάθεια τὰς ἀρετὰς κόσμον· οὐδὲν γὰρ ἕτερόν τι ἔγωγε ἀπάθειαν ὑπείληφα εἶναι· ἀλλ᾿ ἢ ἐγκάρδιον νοὸς οὐρανόν, τὰς τῶν δαιμόνων πανουργίας, ἀθύρματα λοιπὸν λογιζόμενον. Ἅγιος Ἰωάννης τῆς Κλίμακος, ἡ Κλίμαξ, Λογος ΚΘ' Source: Migne PG 88.1148b

Behold, here are we who are laying in the deepest pit of ignorance, in the dark passions and in the shadow of death of this body, having the temerity to begin to philosophize about heaven on earth. For the firmament has the stars for its beauty, and dispassion has the virtues for its adornment; and by dispassion I mean nothing else but the interior heaven of the mind, which considers the snares of demons to be mere toys. Saint John Climacus, The Ladder, from Step 29

Babylon And Philosophy

Et tradidit Dominus in manu eius Ioacim regem Iuda. Quodque traditus scribitur Ioacim, monstrat non adversariorum fortitudinis fuisse victoriam, sed Domini voluntatis. Et partem vasorum domus Dei, et asportavit ea in terram Sennaar, in domum Dei sui, et vasa intulit in domum thesauri Dei sui. Terra Sennaar locus est Babylonis in quo fuit campus Dura, et turris quam usque coelum hi qui ab Oriente moverant pedes suos, aedificare conati sunt. Unde et a confusione linguarum locus nomen accepit Babylon, quae in linguam nostram tranfertur confusio. Simul et animadvertendum secundum anagogen, quod rex Babylonis non potuerit universa Dei vasa transferre, et in idolio quod sibi finxerat collocare, sed partem vasorum domus Dei, quae intelligenda sunt dogmata veritatis. Si enim cunctos philosophorum revolvas libros, necesse est ut in eis reperias aliquam partem vasorum Dei. Ut apud Platonem, fabricatorem mundi Deum, ut apud Zenonem Stoicorum principem, inferos et immortales animas, et unum bonum, honestatem; sed quia iungunt mendacium veritati, et naturae bonum multis perdunt malis, ideo partem vasorum domus Dei, et non omnia vasa integra atque perfecta cepisse memorantur. Sanctus Hieronymus, Commentariorum in Daniel, Caput I Source:  Migne PL 25.498d-449a

And the Lord gave Jehoiakim, king of Judah, into his hand. 1 Since it is written that Jehoiakim was given, it shows that victory was not on account of the adversary's strength, but by the will of the Lord. And a part of the vessels of the Lord he brought to the land of Shinar, to the house of his god, and he placed the vessels in the house of the treasury of his god. 1 The land of Shinar is a place of Babylon in which was plain of Dura and the tower which they tried to build to heaven, those ones who marched from the east. 2 Whence from the confusion of tongues the place received the name of Babylon, which translated into our tongue is 'confusion'. 3 At the same time one must attend to the anagogical meaning, that the king of Babylon was not able to bear off all the vessels of God, and having gathered them fashion them into idols for himself, but only a part of the vessels of the house of God, by which should be understood the teachings of truth. For if you should unroll all the works of the philosophers, it is inevitable that in them you shall find some part of the vessels of God. So in Plato there is a god who is the creator of the world, and in Zeno, the head of the Stoics, there are inferior and immortal souls, and one good, righteousness. But because they join a lie to truth and ruin the good of nature with many evils, therefore they are recorded as having seized only a part of the vessels of the house of God, and not every perfect and clean one. Saint Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, Chapter 1 1 Dan 1.2 2 Gen 11.1-9 3 Understood presently to be from the native 'Bābilim', meaning 'gate of the god(s)'

Thinking Of Divinity

Τί τοῦτο ἔπαθον, ὦ φίλοι καὶ μύσται καὶ τῆς ἀληθείας συνερασταί; ἔτρεχον μὲν ὡς θεὸν καταληψόμενος, καὶ οὕτως ἀνῆλθον ἐπὶ τὸ ὄρος, καὶ τὴν νεφέλην διέσχον, εἴσω γενόμενος ἀπὸ τῆς ὕλης καὶ τῶν ὑλικῶν, καὶ εἰς ἐμαυτὸν ὡς οἷόν τε συστραφείς. ἐπεὶ δὲ προσέβλεψα, μόλις εἶδον θεοῦ τὰ ὀπίσθια· καὶ τοῦτο τῇ πέτρᾳ σκεπασθείς, τῷ σαρκωθέντι δι' ἡμᾶς θεῷ Λόγῳ· καὶ μικρὸν διακύψας, οὐ τὴν πρώτην τε καὶ ἀκήρατον φύσιν, καὶ ἑαυτῇ, λέγω δὴ τῇ τριάδι, γινωσκομένην, καὶ ὅση τοῦ πρώτου καταπετάσματος εἴσω μένει καὶ ὑπὸ τῶν χερουβὶμ συγκαλύπτεται, ἀλλ' ὅση τελευταία καὶ εἰς ἡμᾶς φθάνουσα. Ἡ δέ ἐστιν, ὅσα ἐμὲ γινώσκειν, ἡ ἐν τοῖς κτίσμασι καὶ τοῖς ὑπ' αὐτοῦ προβεβλημένοις καὶ διοικουμένοις μεγαλειότης, ἤ, ὡς ὁ θεῖος ∆αβὶδ ὀνομάζει, μεγαλοπρέπεια. Tαῦτα γὰρ θεοῦ τὰ ὀπίσθια, ὅσα μετ' ἐκεῖνον ἐκείνου γνωρίσματα, ὥσπερ αἱ καθ' ὑδάτων ἡλίου σκιαὶ καὶ εἰκόνες ταῖς σαθραῖς ὄψεσι παρα δεικνῦσαι τὸν ἥλιον, ἐπεὶ μὴ αὐτὸν προσβλέπειν οἶόν τε, τῷ ἀκραιφνεῖ τοῦ φωτὸς νικῶντα τὴν αἴσθησιν. οὕτως οὖν θεολογήσεις, κἂν ᾖς Μωυσῆς καὶ Φαραὼ θεός, κἂν μέχρι τρίτου κατὰ τὸν Παῦλον οὐρανοῦ φθάσῃς, καὶ ἀκούσῃς ἄρρητα ῥήματα· κἂν ὑπὲρ ἐκεῖνον γένῃ, ἀγγελικῆς τινὸς ἢ ἀρχαγγελικῆς στάσεώς τε καὶ τάξεως ἠξιωμένος. Kἂν γὰρ οὐράνιον ἅπαν, κἂν ὑπερουράνιόν τι, καὶ πολὺ τὴν φύσιν ὑψηλότερον ἡμῶν ᾖ, καὶ ἐγγυτέρω θεοῦ, πλέον ἀπέχει θεοῦ καὶ τῆς τελείας καταλήψεως, ἢ ὅσον ἡμῶν ὑπεραίρει τοῦ συνθέτου καὶ ταπεινοῦ καὶ κάτω βρίθοντος κράματος. Ἀρκτέον οὖν οὕτω πάλιν. θεὸν νοῆσαι μὲν χαλεπόν· φράσαι δὲ ἀδύνατον, ὥς τις τῶν παρ' Ἕλλησι θεολόγων ἐφιλοσόφησεν, οὐκ ἀτέχνως ἐμοὶ δοκεῖν, ἵνα καὶ κατειληφέναι δόξῃ τῷ χαλεπὸν εἰπεῖν, καὶ διαφύγῃ τῷ ἀνεκφράστῳ τὸν ἔλεγχον. Ἀλλὰ φράσαι μὲν ἀδύνατον, ὡς ὁ ἐμὸς λόγος, νοῆσαι δὲ ἀδυνατώτερον. Tὸ μὲν γὰρ νοηθὲν τάχα ἂν λόγος δηλώσειεν, εἰ καὶ μὴ μετρίως, ἀλλ' ἀμυδρῶς γε, τῷ μὴ πάντῃ τὰ ὦτα διεφθαρμένῳ καὶ νωθρῷ τὴν διάνοιαν. τὸ δὲ τοσοῦτον πρᾶγμα τῇ διανοίᾳ περιλαβεῖν πάντως ἀδύνατον καὶ ἀμήχανον, μὴ ὅτι τοῖς καταβεβλακευμένοις καὶ κάτω νεύουσιν, ἀλλὰ καὶ τοῖς λίαν ὑψηλοῖς τε καὶ φιλοθέοις, καὶ ὁμοίως πάσῃ γεννητῇ φύσει, καὶ οἷς ὁ ζόφος οὗτος ἐπιπροσθεῖ καὶ τὸ παχὺ τοῦτο σαρκίον πρὸς τὴν τοῦ ἀληθοῦς κατανόησιν. Oὐκ οἶδα δέ, εἰ μὴ καὶ ταῖς ἀνωτέρω καὶ νοεραῖς φύσεσιν, αἳ διὰ τὸ πλησίον εἶναι θεοῦ, kαὶ ὅλῳ τῷ φωτὶ καταλάμπεσθαι, τυχὸν ἂν καὶ τρανοῖντο, εἰ καὶ μὴ πάντῃ, ἀλλ' ἡμῶν γε τελεώτερόν τε καὶ ἐκτυπώτερον, καὶ ἄλλων ἄλλαι πλεῖον ἢ ἔλαττον, κατὰ τὴν ἀναλογίαν τῆς τάξεως. Ἅγιος Γρηγόριος ὁ Ναζιανζηνός, Λογός ΚΗ', Περὶ θεολογίας, Source: Migne PG 35.29a-32a

What is this that has happened, O friends and initiates and fellow lovers of the truth? I was running so that I might take hold of God, and thus I went up into the Mount, and I drew back the cloud, and I went in away from matter and material things, and as much as I could I withdrew into myself. And then, when I looked, I hardly saw even the back parts of God, 1 and this when sheltered by the Rock, the Divine Word made flesh for us. And peering a little more, I saw not the First and unmixed Nature, known to Itself, to the Trinity, I say, not that which dwells within the first veil and is concealed by the Cherubim, but only that nature which at last reaches even to us. Which is, as far as I can learn, that which is found among the created things He has produced and governed, the Majesty, or as the holy David names it, the Glory. 2 For these are the back parts of God, which He leaves behind Him as declarations of Himself, like the shadows and reflection of the sun in the water which show the sun to our weak eyes, since we cannot look at it, because by His pure light our sense is overwhelmed. Thus theologise, even if you be a Moses and a god to Pharaoh, even if you be caught up like Paul to the third heaven, and have heard unspeakable words, 3 even if you be raised above them both and exalted to angelic or archangelic place and rank. For though a thing be all heavenly, or above heaven, and far higher in nature than us and nearer to God, yet it is more distant from God and His perfect comprehension than it is lifted above our compound and humble and downward dragging mixture. Let us then begin again. It is difficult to think of God, but to speak of Him an impossibility, as one of the Greek theologians philosophised, and not ineptly, as it seems to me, who says that having lain hold it is difficult to tell, 4 yet we may fly censure for being unable to speak. For, so I say, it is impossible to tell, and to conceive Him even more impossible. For that which is conceived can perhaps be made manifest in speech, if within limits, only obscurely, to those all who have not lost their ears, and are not dull in understanding. But to perfectly comprehend such greatness is impossible and impracticable, not only to those who are negligent and of inferior capability, but even to those exceedingly exalted and who love God, and likewise with every created nature, since the gloom here and the heaviness of the flesh obscures the understanding of the truth. I do not know if it is so with higher and more intellectual natures, which by being nearer to God, and being lit with all His light, may perhaps see clearly, and if not the whole, yet more perfectly and distinctly than us, some more, and some less, in accordance with their rank. Saint Gregory Nazianzus, from Oration 28, On Theology 1 Exod 33.23 2 Ps 8.2 3 Exod 7.2, 2 Cor 12.2 4 Plato Timeaus 28c